Terminally Disorganised?

Is Buddhism terminally disorganised? This arresting phrase was used in reference to recent controversy around bhikkhuni ordination. There does seem to be a lack of robust Buddhist institutions, and a marked reluctance to create them. Perhaps, in the West, this is a knee-jerk antipathy to 'organised religion' and a fear that Buddhism might develop oppressive and bureaucratic structures riven by political factions. Or perhaps there is just too much fear and distrust between Western Buddhists.

But can we conceive of helpful organisations? Ones which strive for openness, democracy, consensus, involvement, and the truth? Surely, some inspired by the Buddha's teachings and having realised how valuable the Buddhist path is, might feel moved to volunteer time to help disseminate Buddhist news, support for students, networking initiatives, and other organisations which can help Buddhism to become firmly embedded in Western culture?

I notice that the NBO struggles to find sufficient voluntary effort, as does every other worthwhile Buddhist initiative that I have ever been involved with, whilst other 'faiths' appear to struggle somewhat less.

Comments

[Matt]

Maybe the emphasis is where it should be - on practice rather than institions?

[Chris]

Certainly, the emphasis on practice is right. But why should work on maintaining institutions not be right practice? Institution is of course a loaded word. It carries a sense of authority, conservatism and for me a sort of oppresiveness. If I use the word 'Sangha' or 'Community' or 'Charity' instead of institution, would the generous offer of time to these be considered right practice?

[Jonno]

Talking only for myself I'm perfectly happy not being associated with something structural. It was a breath of fresh air visiting a monastery where nothing was asked of me other than to practice.

I've had enough with status and personality based structures. In some of the organisations I've come across before it certainly seems that ego based on those is not in short supply.

If it is possible to have the positive qualities you mention then that does sound helpful though.

[Chris]

I understand the delight of being a participant with nothing expected of one. There is everything right about this. However,there is a structure and organisation behind the events or groups you experience, and this requires to be maintained by someone. And we cannot simply pretend that good Dharma centres, groups and retreats and so on, simply happen by magic. They depend upon a lot of effort, often voluntary, to make them happen.

I am sorry that you find ego to be linked with the provision of Dharma, but is this inevitable? Surely not. Although with any organisation, decisions have to be made, and with decisions comes differing views, and with differing views comes 'politics'. This is inevitable. We just have to learn to live with it and strive to create healthy and open organisations.